I have been giving some thought to the comments made at the de linking meeting. I think that it is reasonable to accept that the whole point of the new bridge and the de linking process is not about the road works, but rather the regeneration properties that can be brought to both Runcorn and Widnes. I do not believe that that point can be disputed. To build a bridge and alter the road works can be a great exercise in transport logistics, but cannot be justified when looking at all the other towns in the land who also have nightmare scenarios with their logistical strips of tarmac. I have always assumed that Halton have only got Government backing because of the “add ons” and the possible regenerative properties that the Borough should produce with the sort of investment that is being discussed. Having said that I do not believe that we should regenerate the areas in the manner that has been proposed, and would request if a further look at the proposals should be made. I have listed some of my personal thoughts for further discussion and would be willing to clarify any of the details mentioned or give further explanations.
In Runcorn I am suggesting no change to the loops roadworks but a new complex built on the site of the existing loops footprint. This new complex would incorporate a transport hub, car parking, hotel and commercial centre all linked to the station with travellators. The existing Queensway viduct sandwiched between the Waterloo Bridge and the railway would remain (although modified) whilst the Queensway viduct shooting off from the SJB to the old spur road would be demolished and the area to the north regenerated with commercial, leisure and residential with an inclusion for car parking. A new system of pedestrianized travellators would link the Brindlet to the new commercial centre onto the transport hub and beyond to the Runcorn Docks Residential area
In Widnes, I am suggesting that the proposals put forward by GVA Grimley should be modified to include a road cycling track and BMK area in an area that I believe is unacceptable for houses as proposed.
Phil Balmer
Filed under: personal views
